People prefer perfection in everyday work of their life. Some people think that working quickly would bring out more fruitful output than working slowly. They cite that some mistakes are inevitable and could be manageable and so it's better to work quickly. However, I strongly disagree with them and I prefer to work slowly so that there is no chance of making any mistake. I will support my viewpoint with three reasons.
First of all, when working quickly the probability of making mistakes is too high and some mistakes could be non-reversible. For example, when a doctor is operating an operation he is not allowed to make any mistake. Because that could lead to deteriorate the condition of his patient also could be life threatening. Making no mistakes is always preferable in almost every profession. A single mistake could ruin a whole project sometime.
Second of all, when we work in haste we ignore little details in work and that brings out bigger problem later. One single mistake, if not solved on time due to haste, could lead to ten more mistakes and at the end it could ruin the whole project. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this. I was working on a project and my manager made a mistake at the beginning of the project by taking wrong requirements which was totally different from what our client asked from. At the end of our project, our client had to drop the project which was both waste of time and money.
Finally, working quickly could bring a lot of pressure on our brain. Always working under pressure is not a good practice for any profession. That could lead to any brain injury or mental health problem in near future. For instance, people who always work under a lot of pressure are always in bad mental health. They don't enjoy the time when they are not even working. They return home tiring and can not provide any time to his family or himself. This is why I prefer to work slowly without any pressure.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- TPO 08 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 02 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 03 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 03 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... he is not allowed to make any mistake. Because that could lead to deteriorate the cond...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e are always in bad mental health. They dont enjoy the time when they are not even w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65606936416 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43788996766 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.711281461 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2272727273 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219004501525 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694193840521 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639849372462 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146763090075 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742160345872 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.