In the twenty years, there will be fewer cars in the use than today.
Views differ when it comes to transportation methods used by people in the future. Many may hold the view that the number of cars in society will be reduced. Some others, however, may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that fewer cars will be used in the next twenty years. As far as I am concerned, the application of personal cars will be diminished in twenty years because not only the government will expand the public transportation system, but also the development of technology will reduce the need for cars. In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint my case.
The first exquisite reasons worth mentioning is that the system of public transportation will cover all parts of the city. Nowadays, one of the challenges of a society is the traffic that wastes time. Because of that, public transportation system such as buses and subways has been used by government to diminish it. However, the public navigation system is limited and do not answer the need of all people. By passing twenty year, the navigation system will be improved and enlarged enough to solve the traffic problem. Therefore, people instead of using their car, can use this system to reach their destination. For instance, In the city of Tehran, many subway stations are not completed yet and people use their personal vehicle to go to work or shopping. When the station is completed, people can transport by public vehicles and stop using personal cars.
A furthur more subtle point is that usage of cars will be ceased by the advancement of technology. Today, technology is developing at a high pace and making a lot of discoveries that high-speed internet is one of them. It can assist people to engage in their job from distance. They can easily share their ideas, ask questions, and socialize without the need to go to the workplace. Also, there are many smart devices and applications which will make people's life easier. They can order and purchase by the use of this application and after that their purchases will be sent to their location. Consequently, the need of personal cars will be stoped by this method.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, people will use fewer cars due to transporting with public vehicles and the advanced technology in twenty years. Therefore, it is vital to make the mind of people ready for that times which can be hard to comprehend in the future.
- TPO 4 80
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- TPO 34 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...n methods used by people in the future. Many may hold the view that the number of cars i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84914841849 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72982508451 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493917274939 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2661599406 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5909090909 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371182562993 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10790182841 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959680360431 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247096081519 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944147177862 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.