Choosing facilities to develop for students in universities becomes a difficult topic to make a decision due to many choices. Some people think that the university should spend money on the quality of technologies which is important for students, while others believe that redesigning the space of club meetings to make more comfortable and appealing is the best idea. In my opinion, I definitely prefer to improve technologies' qualities for students for a few reasons.
First of all, many technologies, such as computers, printers, and so on, are used to learn in universities, so they are important for every student. If these tools have low quality, it may affect on students' works. Engineering students, for example, have some subjects that have to create three-dimensional models in computer labs. This program uses a lot of computer resources in the rendering process; therefore, the program might spend plenty of time to execute providing that the computers are too old, but it will have a different result if the computers are changed to new ones. Thus, working speed is one of the reasons that the university should improve the technologies.
Furthermore, the students have an opportunity to learn some new technologies because improvement sometimes comes together with new equipment. The electronic board is an example of these opportunities because of fast-changing. In the university laboratory, new electronic boards usually have new functions which cannot find on the old version of these boards. For instance, the new boards might be able to program to show light and play audio at the same time, so students can learn how to program these two features together on the new boards.
At the end of the day, although developing meeting space is good, spending budget on improving the qualities of technologies is better due to increasing the working speed of students and creating opportunities to learn new things. If universities choose to improve as mention above, the students will certainly get the benefits.
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 67
- Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attraction in a country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 71
- For centuries, important parts of education have remained such as reading, writing and maths. With the advent of computers, some people think that computer skill be made as a fourth skill to be added to the list. To what extent do you agree? (IELTS Academ 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...If these tools have low quality, it may affect on students works. Engineering students, f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24233128834 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04225359506 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6646035893 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310984625488 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107231131381 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756935840714 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193182566269 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942951029447 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.