What do you want most in a friend — someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, or someone who is reliable? Which one of these characteristics is most important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
Most of the relations in our life come by birth like father, mother, brother, sister. The relation of friends is the most prominent which we choose by ourselves. Friendship never sees the religion, colour of skin or country. A true friend must be reliable, intelligent, must have a great sense of humour. Some of the points are mentioned as follows.
Firstly, it will not be false to aver that reliability is the most vital character of a human being. To share secrets, ups and downs in life, with a person to whom we trust, is a bliss. I share friendship with one of my close friends for more than 15 years since my graduate time. The deep understanding has rooted our trust over each other. Every time, I am engaged in some tough situation, he stood always beside me. I can share my feelings at bad times even in good times too, at every single moment I have his emotional or sometimes financial support too, with me.
Secondly, to posit that with a good sense of humour and intelligence, a true friend will never let you feel bad or alone in your sad moments. He boosts you in the times when you are on the threshold. The friendship of Lord Krishna and his friend Sudama, in Vedic times from India, is a perfect blend of all the characters. It portrays a relationship where, friends are not bound to status, money or any of the things in the world. Lord Krishna, being a ruler of a dynasty, greeted and indulged himself in his friends' service in a way, that has set an example in our country for friends.
In conclusion, it can be outlined that I will pick for all the characters in picking friends with reliability as a priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | rohitbibra | 60 | view |
| 2017-05-13 | Delara | 76 | view |
| 2016-08-11 | sadra1988 | 76 | view |
| 2016-03-30 | younes.tatari | 80 | view |
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 80
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials.Companies that receiv 3
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their empl 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with this idea? Technology decrease children creativity. Give your reasons. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ent, must have a great sense of humour. Some of the points are mentioned as follows. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'stood'.
Suggestion: always stood
... am engaged in some tough situation, he stood always beside me. I can share my feelings at b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49498327759 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5617069901 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5114831989 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0588235294 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121518867821 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395788572371 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04001904504 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733656309138 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362676997395 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.