When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Technology is improved, and people like to be in touch with each other through the network. Email is one of the ways that people can communicate with each other. From my perspective use, email is beneficial somehow for communicating about projects. Arguing about a project in person is much effective. I am going to prove this idea for a couple of reasons.
First of all, body language is one of the main reasons to transfer your idea to the team or a person, either classmate or colleague. When two people meet in person, problems and conflict could solve faster. For example, last year, one of my colleagues had finished the project and emailed me that I completed all parts; without letting me help him, and I was working on the same concept.
So I got mad and told him, this is not fear. He said, because you were sick, I didn't want to disturb you, that's why I finished it myself. If we met in person, this conflict would not occur.
Secondly, sending an email maybe is good, but it takes time to get the reply. So wasting time is one of the negative parameters which can not be denied.Sometimes people do not have time to check their email or miss the email because it is sent to trash. For instance, Once I finished the part of the project which I supposed to do and emailed it to the manager. Because he had plenty of email in his inbox, he took time to send back the email to me; I got panic because of no reply after while he replied back. If I went to him to tell the state of the project, I would get a better result without any panic.
Thirdly, typing text does not give us the opportunity to say whatever is in our minds. Mostly, typing main points is the way of arguing in email. Even though It takes less time to say what you need or what you did in the project, But it is not waste enough, and no detail will be included. Meet in person, let him talk as much as needed to present what he did and what he needs to complete the project. For example, I sent an email to my boss and explained to him the project is over, and the output is ready. He rejected my project because I did not emphasize my work well enough in that email. But when I went to him, and when I went to him and explained all tasks I have done, he convinced.
To sum up, meet in person is much effective, although it will tale more time compared to writing the email in five minutes, still is usable and much helpful to present yourself in a way you did your project exactly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lleague. When two people meet in person, problems and conflict could solve faster...
^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...fear. He said, because you were sick, I didnt want to disturb you, thats why I finish...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...were sick, I didnt want to disturb you, thats why I finished it myself. If we met in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sometimes
...tive parameters which can not be denied.Sometimes people do not have time to check their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: SENT_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'emailed'.
Suggestion: emailed
...to complete the project. For example, I sent an email to my boss and explained to him the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, for instance, i suppose, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24416135881 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33599684928 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48195329087 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4371952427 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2916666667 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217187248503 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649742645808 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604001844738 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112211119781 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559684786165 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.31 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.