When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Life is full of sudden things which may lead people to either paramount or misfortune of their life. However, most of the people count hard working as the most influential thing that affects success in further, the occasion can give people great opportunities too. Thus, I strongly believe not only someone`s way to work hard, but perfect timed circumstance can open the door to success.
Law of nature is unequal alike sometimes the animal which can disguise the most survive well instead of the animal that escapes from a predator. There are many people, who work as if they are made of iron, but never achieved their goal. On the other hand, there are some numbers of people who thrived easily by the incident. Interestingly, there is a man who dreamed several numbers which are turned into lottery numbers of million dollar grant in Europe. An opportunity is intangible that can happen to anyone at any time.
Nowadays, as the technological development advances, people prefer working smart rather than working hard. It means they are getting aware of the poor impact of hard working to achieve a goal. By estimating the exactness and effectiveness on any problem, it will be feasible to turn the negative situation into a fortune. One of my acquaintances, the one who barely attend in the lecture of biochemistry, present his assignment found from google in front of a class by telling a gentle joke and attracting teacher to himself, he passed that course well.
Generally, not every people who work as dog succeed in life. But people who try to solve problems smart, by estimating, processing and illustrating in a good way, tend to accomplish their aim expeditiously. The early bird gets the first worm, but the wisest bird gets the fastest one
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | fofty | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | Yanjka | 83 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | SammyQWERTY | 76 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | Yanjka | 76 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | SammyQWERTY | 76 | view |
- sea pollution 80
- You have the opportunity to visit a foreign country for two weeks. Which country would you like to visit? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice? 76
- some people like to go to the same places for their vacations Other people like to take their vacations in different places Which one do you prefer 80
- how music affect consumer`s behavior 80
- color influence 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91610738255 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75714181692 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7707064863 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108743361523 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393441901201 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433706653275 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676653134652 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333593348487 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.