when a teacher or a leader say something incorrect. in which way do you prefer to say him. after meeting or between it or do not say something
In the progressive and sophisticated worlds where we live, people usually attend in various meetings. In some meeting the leaders or speakers make some mistakes during their presentation that we should correct that and modify their mistake. To reaching this goal, some individuals talk to leader or teacher after the presentation or meeting when all audiences leave the place. while some correct their mistakes during the speech or sometimes they do not say anything. I subscribe to first perspective because of some reasons that will be elaborated on following paragraph.
To begin with, correcting one persons errors during a speech distract the speaker's attention so he cannot concentrate on the rest of lecture. People usually have stress when they talk among many audiences so they hardly remember what they want to talk about. In this situation some sudden distractions like speaking with a listenner who wants to correct him lead to extra predicaments like forgotting the subjects. This behavior also increase their stress during an important meeting. To light on this matter, i will bring up an example in which i was involve. In the second year of bachelor studies at university, we had a final project related to our psychology class to have a lecture and clarify the results of our research. It was difficult for me to speak among many students and i started my lecture with stress. Among my speech, our professor talk about some sources that we should consider for our projects. This item increases my stress and i totally forgot my speech so i got bad grades at the end of semester. This example aptly illuminates how important and beneficial it is to modify individuls mistakes after they presentation.
Second, by talking with leaders about their mistakes after the meeting we never affect others audiences attitudes toward them. To clarify this, audiences trust to leaders when they listen to their speech based on their academic knowledge or experience but when people declares leader's mistake, they lose their confidence and think that maybe all of their assertion is wrong. Dibating about the lecture during speech spread all audiences who were really enthusiastic about the title of lecture. The Asian society of managing street meeting before main elections declares that about 70 percent of audience leave the place when one person criticizes candidate or mentions his mistakes. So, modifying their mistakes also distract the managing of a meeting.
In conclusion, contemplating all above reasons and examples into account, one can conclude that we should talks about one person's mistake after meeting. Since we do not distract their attention or concentration. Furthermore, we do not affect other's opinion during a speech that maybe distract the meeting.
- childrens rely on technology for entetainment but playin outside with friendsis better for them 86
- in the past it was easier toidentify what type of career or job would lead to a secure or successful future. 3
- all university students required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- do you believe that parents should spend their little time playing with children or helping them at schiil work 73
- leadership comes naturally. one can not learn to be a leader 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ing when all audiences leave the place. while some correct their mistakes during the ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...ons errors during a speech distract the speakers attention so he cannot concentrate on t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rtant meeting. To light on this matter, i will bring up an example in which i was...
^
Line 2, column 546, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...er, i will bring up an example in which i was involve. In the second year of bach...
^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'involved'.
Suggestion: involved
...will bring up an example in which i was involve. In the second year of bachelor studies...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...for me to speak among many students and i started my lecture with stress. Among m...
^
Line 2, column 981, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tress and i totally forgot my speech so i got bad grades at the end of semester. ...
^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one person', 'a person', or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: one person; a person; persons
...can conclude that we should talks about one persons mistake after meeting. Since we do not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, really, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20758928571 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69842253469 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511160714286 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3767868118 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.434782609 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104657348974 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331391582793 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431758642254 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743541439715 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402021485965 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.