workers are satisfied to do defferent tasks than doing similar tasks
In the progressive and sophisticated world where we live, workers striving hard during a day to gain money based on their daily work. There also have been two contrasting attitudes toward this, while some believe that they should do various tasks during workday, others adhere to the idea that repeating similar tasks help them to be expert in their special fields. I support the former perspective. In what follows I will elaborate on my viewpoints.
To begin with, doing various tasks helps them to improve their skills and learn new works to have higher wages. During a special situation they can experience different position and face new challenges to enhance their ability so by doing that their patron will increase their wages because they become a multi-task worker. Using this kind of worker also helps managers to save their time which they spend for searching new workers. To shed light on this reason I will bring up an example in which I was involved. In the second year of bachelor studies at university, we had an assignment to evaluate the effects of using fewer worker with different skills in prosperous of big projects. We examined various kind of structures that use workers for building so the results showed that the building process was rapid in some cases that allowed workers to do various tasks. Furthermore, they continued next projects with same workers to achieve to their goals.
Another valuable point is that the more workers do uniform and similar tasks, the more they will be tired and reluctant related to their job. By doing similar tasks for a long time they do not visit any progress and improvements in their job so they lose their incentive and innovation during works. The Asian society of managing workers found that about 60 percent of workers who repeat same job during their professional job period prefer to be retired sooner than others. Furthermore, some predicaments create at other parts of their life because they have low incentive for continuing their routine life.
Third, doing various task conducive to collaborating with many people and enhancing their communication skills. This skill plays an important role in new societies because people are able to find more and new job through visiting many managers. Finally, they have better opportunity to work in better projects with higher incomes.
In conclusion, considering all aforementioned reason, one can conclude that by doing various kind of work during workdays, workers become more innovative and acquire higher skills to improve their job situations. Furthermore multi-task workers have higher chance to work in big projects and gain more incomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- it is important for government to spend money to improve internet access 76
- companies should hire their employees for a small period than entire life 73
- the ability to maintain friendship for a long period of time with small friends is important than making many friends easily 60
- the opinion of celebrities are more important to younger people than they are to older people 71
- the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...skills to improve their job situations. Furthermore multi-task workers have higher chance t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in big projects and gain more incomes.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12155963303 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5891265106 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6321907201 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.65 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257919329284 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855781100857 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798894551472 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16542082454 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395398284378 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.