Learning, the founding stone of one’s academic achievement, has been valued and even triggers a heated discussion over how to learn a subject in a short time. In other’s view, students should work alone to grasp things quickly. Contrary to these people’s opinions is my perspective that learning in a group would benefit students, due to the contribution to the efficiency.
What should be prioritized is that by studying in a group rather than in solitary learning, students can access the group members’ knowledge base, accelerating the learning process. To begin with, by studying with a group of friends, we can have in-depth discussions by exchanging thoughts from different angles. Such academic communication is conducive for students to have deep insight into others’ ideas and correct biases. To be specific, friends and classmates, who have already mastered the topic, are able to introduce and explain the elusive concepts to us in an accessible way. That means they can better elucidate the sophisticated materials to us in a straightforward fashion and we can master the thesis quickly. In addition, in such a conversation, our prejudice could be corrected timely by our friends when we express our biased perspectives. Therefore, group learning is a catalyst for our learning process. On the other hand, if we study in a solitary manner, we may be restricted by our limited thoughts, and we may struggle with certain comprehensive concepts for a long time because nobody reaches out to us, which decelerates our learning progress.
What should be equally worth discussing is that learning with classmates or friends, instead of learning alone, will boost efficiency and help us mater a subject in a short time, by facilitating us to concentrate on the field of study. In collective learning, the interaction among the group members prevents them from getting distracted. To be specific, we usually discuss certain problems, share thoughts, and respond to others’ ideas. What’s more, there may be some serious peers, who are strict in the timetable, to motivate us. Under this scenario, we are naturally motivated to contemplate the subjects, so we are less likely to shift our attention to unrelated things. On the contrary, in solitary learning, we do not have external factors to help us keep focused, and thus we are more possibly to lose our focus.
Indeed, studying alone may seem to help us retain minimal distractions. It is because we can review the materials in a quiet place, where nobody is moving around and talking with you. In this scenario, we are less possibly to get distracted. However, distractions may also be triggered by solitary study. In detail, we may spend a great deal of time puzzling over the issues we have come up against, which stretches our attention span. Being forced to elongate our attention, we will get distracted.
To conclude, only by learning in groups, instead of studying alone, can we reap the maximum benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an accessible way" with adverb for "accessible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and explain the elusive concepts to us in an accessible way. That means they can better elucidate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straightforward fashion" with adverb for "straightforward"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...idate the sophisticated materials to us in a straightforward fashion and we can master the thesis quickly. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 956, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a solitary manner" with adverb for "solitary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...process. On the other hand, if we study in a solitary manner, we may be restricted by our limited th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15400410678 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94851515064 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5318275154 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 4.94265232975 384% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3245874849 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2916666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155972021684 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459344783955 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453195863194 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938364097081 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510714010356 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.