Which one of the following do you prefer to choose/find a successful job? • Asking the opinions of others (real-life and online friends) • Sending letters to the company • Looking for information on the internet or advertisements in the newspaper
Nowadays, people should be careful about the decisions that they make. For being sure, most of the time we search and ask for advice from people who have a similar experience in an area that we want information. About choosing a career, the first part, making a decision, is a big deal; Because we are going to do that job for the rest of our life and if we make a wrong decision according to inappropriate information, we will loos our time. In this circumstance, ask for advice from an experienced individual is more beneficial than the internet or advertisement or even from the companies. Because those, who have the experience, they go that way and they have been in that situation. I will explore my spot point in the following essay.
Initially, Asking for information from a person, who had made that decision is more helpful. According to individual experience, you can get right and complete information in that area and you can be able to make an appropriate decision. In contrast, the internet can give you wrong data about the job, because it is an electronic area. It has lots of helpful information, but it can be the second round of your research. On the other hand, another resource can be the organization that is your goal, but they will give you all advantages of their job.
Secondly, that person, who is your resource, can give you a wide vision of that career despite the information. In other words, you can prepare yourself for the responsibility that is going to be yours. It does provide a full picture of the career and you have a chance to improve your skill according to the data.
In conclusion, an individual will be more beneficial and give you complete vision according to her/ his own experience. And electronic sources can not give you the information in a perfect way. Thus, there will be a part of you that is not sure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-04 | Leili | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 82 | view |
| 2020-06-06 | sheri1997 | 60 | view |
- the chart bellow shows the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 65
- in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'advantage'
Suggestion: advantage
...s your goal, but they will give you all advantages of their job. Secondly, that person, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect way" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ources can not give you the information in a perfect way. Thus, there will be a part of you that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63939393939 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79591233831 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481818181818 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0180386374 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0588235294 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149636134232 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541653214909 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349300134181 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946273151247 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235794885296 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.