Which way will make the work more efficient? Quiet environment; Complete with rewards; Do interesting things.
In this era of globalization, everyone nowadays is involved and busy doing their work. But what matters most is the efficacy with which work in being accomplished. For this purpose, one should be driven by a particular goal so that they can strive and work hard to achieve it. In this regard, some people have the perception that to make work more efficient, certain main factors play an important role, whether it is a quiet environment, rewards, or interesting projects. Well, personally, I believe that doing interesting things is crucial. I would substantiate my point by presenting two major reasons and their examples in the following paragraphs.
First, it is vital for people to work for things that are in their own interests. This is because they would be internally motivated and excited to do that work. Intrinsic motivation is the most important and essential force, which could result in working enthusiastically. My past experience is a good case in point. When I used to work for my previous company, I was responsible for handling the accounts department, which was not my interest. As a result, I never did that work sincerely, but on the contrary, since I have joined my current firm, I work for the coding department and it is really interesting work there and I do my job in a much more effective way.
Second, if you are pursuing a job that is your passion, you won’t get bored easily. You will always be ready to do that work until you reach your objectives. Hence, the major cause behind the arduous work is your interest. When I completed my research work for my post-graduation, I realized that it was an area of my interest, which is why I never felt bored doing it. Instead, if any kind of reward is being offered, it would only serve the purpose for a short interval of time or as long as the person is provided with that reward. If a quiet environment is created, then it might also not have any noticeable difference, as it depends on the intentions of the person working there and whether he is willing to do that work.
In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm my point that it is essential to work on an interesting piece of work to do it effectively. To recapitulate, work of your interest does not make you feel monotonous and we will be accomplishing that task with our best efforts. Therefore, due to the aforementioned reasons, I feel that choosing to do interesting work is a good one.
- Which is better for children s education 9 month study and 3 month break or 3 month study and 1 month break 70
- Decreasing number of literature readers 76
- Is the ability to read and write more important today than in the past Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- One should never stop chasing their dreams even it they seem impossible to achieve 73
- Television discourages people from having communication 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... result in working enthusiastically. My past experience is a good case in point. When I used to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accounts'' or 'account's'?
Suggestion: accounts'; account's
...any, I was responsible for handling the accounts department, which was not my interest. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66433566434 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91669594959 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5245162494 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373697078106 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108291905124 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609536150851 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236123796609 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240439737554 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.