At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
By and large, people face a plethora of various problems in their daily lives needed to be contemplated from different angels. Everybody follow some certain approches to cope with these problems such as using their own exprience, asking for others' help, and finding new ways by learning by doing method. A question can be raised in this regard is that what approches people choose to handle creative tasks which are totally diverse. Someone prefers to challange it alone while others prefer to work with others. I concur with the former idea and in the ensuing lines, I will delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
The first reason is that you can benefit from others skills and knowledge. By being a group, people have access to more expreinces and knowledge about new tasks. The more the number of people constitude the group, the more the knowledge and skills people have access to. Thus, the group have a plenty of resorces to encounter creative and demanding works. For example, I wanted to work on interrelated creative project which concentrate on at least to different feilds when I was under graduate student. My professor suggested me to first hold some interviews with other departments student to gain rudimentary knowledge about the thesis. These interviews not only help me to understand better but also they show me the common mistakes and pitfalls that I couldn't figure them out by myself. So, by using other students' expriences and guidances, I found the origin solution for my project.
Secondly, working as a team reduce to totall needed time. As each person can work on the different aspects of new tasks the required time diminishes siginficantly. The individaul can not concentrate on a veraity of things in the same time. Also, s/he get tired soon as people's mental capacity is limited. Moreover, brainstorming in the group can lead to find solutions so faster. People discuss different dimensions of the issue with diverse approches which can provide conductive clues about the problem. Take, for instance, people talk about the problem in lunch time and even in break times. As their minds are looking for the answer unintentionally and automatically in the background of the mind they can detect every possible solutions and take advantage of these conversations.
All aforementioned reasons bring us to conclude that teamworking is a superior approch to encounter creative and demanding tasks as a group have more intellectual resorces and can accomplish tasks in shorter period of time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing sports can teach people lessons about life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor. 76
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmf 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'follows'.
Suggestion: follows
...plated from different angels. Everybody follow some certain approches to cope with the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'departments'' or 'department's'?
Suggestion: departments'; department's
...o first hold some interviews with other departments student to gain rudimentary knowledge a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...the common mistakes and pitfalls that I couldnt figure them out by myself. So, by using...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as a team reduce to totall needed time. As each person can work on the different a...
^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
... of things in the same time. Also, s/he get tired soon as peoples mental capacity i...
^^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... take advantage of these conversations. All aforementioned reasons bring us to c...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 209, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ces and can accomplish tasks in shorter period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in short, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10096153846 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75976195671 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560096153846 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2154059067 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176962518996 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484656551523 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524480696239 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990732912079 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152943342603 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.