Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, peopels behavior is changed as their lifestyle is different than it was in the past few decades. Many people think that working all day long and doing similar tasks is easy and not stressful. In my opinion, it is better that adults accept doing different types of jobs throughout the day. This is because they could become better individuals in doing multiple tasks just by practicing. Also, their day would not be boring.
First of all, people who tend to become in charge of multiple responsibilities will be able to gain experience not be stressed when dealing with challenges. By practicing over and over their abilities of being vigilant and focused on the task will drastically improve their skills. For example, A recent research has shown us that people who trained themselves to do multi tasks, as the time goes by, they became real masters of solving problems. As a result of this, adults could transform themselves to energetic and powerful individuals.
Secondly, working the similar job all day long is boring. People would be productive if they are curious and like what they are doing. Many people would lose interest in their job if that job is monotonous and boring. For instance, about five years ago, I worked for a prestigious company. At the beginning I was exited because my task was new to me. After a couple of years doing the same thing, I lost interest in that position. So that I decided to look for another job, which I thought that would be a challenging and satisfactory. When I found what I was looking for, I felt more dedicated and ready to give my best contribution. Overall, If I had not found a job that was challenging to me, I would have been bored all the time, and that would have effected my job's productivity.
In a nutshell, individuals should try to accept doing different tasks throughout the day. This is because they will practice more to improve the skill of being a multi task person. And because they will not get bored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...changed as their lifestyle is different than it was in the past few decades. Many pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...d on the task will drastically improve. for example, research has shown us that peo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66568914956 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58772356352 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8584655801 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7619047619 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2380952381 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272331675065 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846980482313 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070028722334 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187264254006 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766264011859 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.