Would you prefer to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city?
Everyone has his own preference for different university types. This will raise the question of whether a large university in the city surpasses a small university in the countryside. In my opinion, I will prefer to attend a large university in the city.
First of all, a large university in the city could provide me with plenty of more convenient transportation systems. My previous experience would be a suitable example. When I was an undergraduate, I left my hometown, Hsinchu city, and studied in Taipei city. In Taipei city, I could use lots of diverse types of traffic tools, like Ubike or MRT. For one thing, I will not be bothered by lacking traffic tools to commute because there will be many types of transporting tools for me, such as the Taipei Bus System. For another thing, I could also cut down the discharging amount of carbon dioxide by using public transportation systems, like public bikes or the subway. As a result, I could not only benefit myself but also make some difference to society. By contrast, if I choose to attend a small university in the countryside, I will not be able to use these extremely useful transportation systems.
Second, a large university in the city could broaden my vision by knowing many people from different countries. Take my previous experience, for example. When I was an undergraduate, I attend lots of different types of international clubs, like the English Speaking club. These clubs provided a bunch of opportunities to communicate with foreigners from all over the world, like Japan or Germany. Thus, I could use these precious chances to understand diverse cultures, like German Beer Festival or Japanese animation. Moreover, I could also discuss some historic events with them, like the rise and fall of the British Empire. On top of that, I could enlarge my vision by exchanging thoughts with these international students. In contrast, if I had chosen to study at a small university in the countryside, I would not have been capable of easily making friends with these foreign people and learning about their cultures.
To sum up, these are the two reasons why I choose to attend a large university in the city. On one hand, I could utilize a good deal of totally convenient transportation systems. On the other hand, I could also extend my vision by communicating with international students.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-11-29 | jimHsu | 66 | view |
2019-09-10 | mary.ssherr | 91 | view |
- to understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to spend money to build art museums and music performance centers than to build recreational facilities such as swimming pool and playground 70
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as a higher or a large fine when they cause 73
- Is it better to spend money on traveling and vacations or to save money for the future 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should make it possible for all children to attend preschool early childhood education programs for three year olds for example at no cost to children s families 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...erent university types. This will raise the question of whether a large university in the city surpasse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing, I will not be bothered by lacking traffic tools to commute because there w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, another thing, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, for another thing, for one thing, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95226130653 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97754807358 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489949748744 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2474279509 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214626143852 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766288869353 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10673085829 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18061066828 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14640515949 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.