Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country
I agree with the statement that colleges should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.
Students can broaden their vision by studying in a foreign country. For example, When I was an undergraduate, I majored in computer science at the National Taiwan University. NTU offered a good deal of opportunities of exchanging to foreign counties for students. In these exchanging programs, students could have lots of different options of countries, such Germany or Japan. Because I was looking forward to engaging in automobile industry, I decided to be an exchange student in Germany, and I chose to study in TUM which was a top-notch university in the entire world. In 2020, I started my exchanging semester in Munich, and I spent lots of time visiting many automobile factories, such as BMW and Audi. With this highly precious chance, I could learn many diverse types of professional knowledge about cars, it totally expanded my vision than before. Moreover, I used some time to attend a few professional courses in TUM, such as artificial intelligence and computer vision. In these classes, I finished a self-driving projects with my classmates, in which we utilize lots of software skills, like “pytorch” and databases, which I had never learned in NTU before. Because our self-driving project was appreciated by professors, they encouraged us to attend self-driving car contest named FSAE which there would be over 70 universities attending this contest. In this contest, we continued to improve our autonomous model and reach a higher accuracy about 90%. Finally, we defeated most of other competitors and won a second prize. By contrast, if I hadn’t chose this exchanging program, I might haven’t be able to have such greatly invaluable experience.
Studying abroad can deepen our understanding about foreign culture. For example, when I studied an exchanging program in Germany, I also went to many historical sites, such as the Reichstag in Berlin, which was a historic building built in 1894. In this place, I could understand the rise and fall of the German Empire and discuss lots of interesting historical events happened here with my German friends. Moreover, I also went to Mercedes-Benz museum to learn the developing history of German automobile industry from 1886 to 2020. With these highly valuable opportunities, I could understand about German history deeply than before. Also, I could discuss many intriguing historic subject matters with local people, such as the second world war, which had an extremely profound influence on Germany. In contrast, if I hadn’t decided to study a exchanging program in Germany, I might not be capable of having this great chance to understand German culture and history.
Opponents may argue that studying in a foreign country will require to consume lots of budgets of students. They claim that it will take a great amount of funds for students to accomplish their studies in foreign countries. However, most of exchanging programs in Europe will not need lots of money, such as Germany, where universities will provide full subsidies for exchanging students. If students choose to study in these low-cost countries, they will totally not need to worry about economic situations. Furthermore, if students can still not burden these fees, they can apply for abundant scholarships which the colleges offer to exchange students.
To sum up, I agree with that colleges should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. On one hand, students can broaden their vision by taking some professional courses with foreign professors and classmates. On the other hand, they can also understand foreign culture and history more profound.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1557, Rule ID: HASNT_IRREGULAR_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hadn’t chosen'?
Suggestion: hadn’t chosen
...d won a second prize. By contrast, if I hadn’t chose this exchanging program, I might haven’...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1603, Rule ID: HASNT_IRREGULAR_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'haven’t been'?
Suggestion: haven’t been
... chose this exchanging program, I might haven’t be able to have such greatly invaluable ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 845, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... contrast, if I hadn’t decided to study a exchanging program in Germany, I might ...
^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consuming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: consuming
...dying in a foreign country will require to consume lots of budgets of students. They claim...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, still, at least, for example, in contrast, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3182.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25082508251 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.907929763 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46204620462 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 963.9 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 6.24550561798 368% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4691650576 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.724137931 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8965517241 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31034482759 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296658526079 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934044306608 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165798429793 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286562590962 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237827755625 0.0667264976115 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.