write about the advantages and disadvantages of living a traditional/modern lifestyle.
While some people prefer to live an urban life, others believe that living a rural life is best. With modern life, individuals will benefit from the technology advancements main cities offer and with traditional life, they will enjoy the healthy life style a countryside has..
Firstly, metropolis cities have all means of comfort. In other word, people who live there can have access to all the amenities that will make their lives more comfortable. A friend of mine for example, lives in one of those tall buildings in New York City. He controls everything in his apartment with a remote control. Also, the skyscraper where he lives has a fully equipped gem and a nice restaurant, so he has all what he needs in one place. Consequently, he feels happy. On the other hand, people who inhabit the countryside of any country feel well mentally and physically. This is because, there are many farms, trees and green areas surrounding them and that provide them with fresh air and pure oxygen. Also, they eat fresh organic crops made by their own hands, thus they are not exposed to junk food that can result in dangerous aliments such as, diabetes and obesity. Therefore, individuals in both sides of a country would have upsides to enjoy.
With regards to downsides, a crucial problem of living away from main cities is the few job opportunities available. To better explain, most of the big corporates do not have offices in remote areas. Consequently, one would struggle to get a good job with a descent salary and that would badly affect his career pathway in comparison with his colleagues with the same level of education working in capital cities. And a downside of Living in modern cities is the detrimental impact it may has on people`s health. This is due to the unhealthy life style individuals in such places live. They usually do not have time to cook and depend mainly on fast food chains like KFC or McDonald`s for their diet, and that will end up getting life threatening diseases. Also, the air in big cities is full of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide emitted from vehicles and factories` trucks which will also has negative effects on the long run. Therefore, each area either central or remote has its own disadvantages.
In conclusion, depending on their life preferences, individuals will have some benefits and also some issues such as short life cycles because of multiple risk factors individuals in urban life face and limited resources to grow in their careers for those who prefer the rural life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...the healthy life style a countryside has.. Firstly, metropolis cities have ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...althy life style a countryside has.. Firstly, metropolis cities have all mean...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...country would have upsides to enjoy. With regards to downsides, a crucial pro...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or remote has its own disadvantages. In conclusion, depending on their life p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91224018476 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67343336774 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558891454965 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3195351991 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0817780181536 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278946099394 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393113150669 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532734643694 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036268061625 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.