Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities?
I think this opinion; that young people do not consider adequate time for assisting to their community, is completely false because of some reasons that I will mention.
Firstly, nowadays young generation is busy, and they do not have extra time to spend half of that for other activities like helping. In these days, the young people in conjunction with the study have to work, because they need to gather money for their future lives. In fact, the young peoples’ expectations of life increase and encourage them to benefit from their time. So, the majority of them even do not have any time to have the amusement in their life or being a useful person in their society. However, in the past, the young people did either studying or working, not both of them in same time since this situation let them help to their society. Hence, this situation of the nowadays young people is incomparable with that past one.
In addition, they really spend enough time for helping to their society, but in their way. By emerging a technology everything changes and one of this alternation is the young people’s living way. The young people’s manner is completely different in comparison with the past one. This generation prefers by utilizing a technology being a useful or helper person for their society. For example, they choose the internet for sending money or become aware from their friends instead of going to their home like a past generation. Hence, the different method of helping people by these days young people make this conception that they do not spend enough time for helping people.
In conclusion, the lack of time and a dissimilar style of helping people makes this wrong conception that the young people nowadays do not consider adequate time for assisting to their society.
- young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping to their communities 70
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 81
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer 66
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that is similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, really, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94407894737 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56917581865 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440789473684 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0911267609 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449333777162 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190534280012 0.076458572812 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985326659476 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326860760086 0.150856017488 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067391739974 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.