Your local government has just recently received a large donation from an anonymous donor to improve
the community. Almost everyone agrees that the money should be invested in building a new public
facility. Which of the following do you think your local government should build?
- Build a public library
- Build a public park
- Build a public pool
Donations are an act of generosity that helps all kinds of species on earth. I believe that the money received by the community should be invested in the making of a new public park, not only because it’s practical but also because it would be beneficial to everyone in the community. I think so for the following reasons.
Firstly, a new public park will encourage people to go outside and explore the world. Children, adults, and old people can use the park for various physical and mental activities such as sports, meditation, running, and walking. The park would be used for several recreational exercises which can benefit everyone’s mental and physical health as these days, because of the advent of technology, humans have detached from nature and spend their lives hopelessly on their phones and laptops. Spending more time with mother nature would be advantageous for everyone as it promotes community wellness and would make us feel more refreshed and clear-headed.
Secondly, a new park in the community would increase the fauna and flora in the neighborhood. More species of trees would be introduced, which would make the air clearer and lead to healthier lifestyles in and around the community. More carbon dioxide would be absorbed by the trees leading to more oxygen in the air which would lead to lesser respiratory and heart diseases in children and old people. A new park would create new habitats for different species of animals in this cruel world where deforestation is rampant and thousands of species go extinct every year.
Furthermore, since parks are a desirable commodity, people from nearby communities would also engage in activities in the park which would to a spike in property prices around the community and would increase property rates significantly. Having access to parks also means safer gathering spaces which would decrease the number of crimes in the area and make people feel more secure. Parks also provide a good bonding area where people from all cultures can gather together and enjoy an extensive range of activities.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that building a park is the most pragmatic way to achieve a plethora of benefits, not only for the people in the community but also for animals and the property rates. Parks help diverts the mind and clears it in a way that has massive benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-04 | amchoi0810 | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | amchoi0810 | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | amchoi0810 | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-03 | skmsamu | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Sumit68 | 76 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Socks Inc A recent study of Dura Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our soc 68
- Bears TOEFL INTEGRATED 73
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01275510204 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67687385469 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3373006005 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135717567545 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550439830846 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044872400077 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937416025992 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703244846336 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.