Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend money helping more people access the Internet insteadof improving public transportation.
The government is responsible for developing fundamental equipment and improving basic infrastructure in order to keep up with highly developed society. Some governments decide to spend money on the Internet and relatively ignore the public transportation. From my perspective, I do not agree with it.
Admittedly, it is of importance to offer help to people who have difficult with utilizing the Internet, especially at the age of high-technology. Electronic products, such as computer and smartphone, have been invented to make life more convenient. If people cannot use Internet, it is hard for not only personal improvement but city's growth as well. When some emergency happened immediately, for example, nowadays, the damage caused by virus is increasing serious, the Internet can benefit people's daily life. Students can start online courses without going to school campus; online shopping supports abundant food sources to maintain our health; young people can take online phone to communicate with family even they are far away from home. Thus, it is necessary to pay money on the Internet development.
However, the condition of each government is different. Compared with pay all attention to the Internet, the government is supposed to focus on varieties of national demands. For developed countries, they have already built steady society. On the contrary, for most developing countries, the best approach to construct nation is satisfying fundamental requirement. And it is obvious that public transportation is more basic than the Internet. If people frequently meet difficult situation about traffic, the government cannot set up other tactics. Transportation is an indispensable factor to develop country in numerous fields, such as financial interaction and people's daily life. So, it is impossible to develop high-tech before improving transportation.
Furthermore, when transportation successful build, people will be more likely to catch up with the Internet. They can go outside to city's center or somewhere and enjoy the Internet. For example, I am willing to spend vacation on city's library since I can use the Internet at the quite learning atmosphere. But if I have no idea about how to reach there, in other words, the bus or subway lines are too few to help me go to the library, I will miss the opportunity to take advantage of the Internet, even the Internet is well developed. Therefore, comprehensive transportation is the necessary requirement for improving the Internet.
To put it in a nut shell, although spend money on developing the Internet has advantages, for the sake of more people living in the country, government should better concentrate on the most essential demand and pay more money on transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., the best approach to construct nation is satisfying fundamental requirement. And it is obvi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41299303944 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18661762666 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542923433875 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2704492658 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.434782609 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7391304348 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322601261641 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949473493093 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657922094648 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196827886879 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037185933337 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.