Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.
-choose the members who think and work in similar ways
-choose the members who have totally different ideas
Which would you think is more effective to work with?
In order to work much effectively, I prefer to select the members who think and work in similar ways. There are two reasons as follows.
First, I could save lots of time in this way, since we always think and work similarly. I do not need to spend some extra time explaining to each other about the reason why I work or think like this. In this case, we are able to have more time to do other important things of the project such as finding information on the Internet, reading some books in the library and stuff like that. Therefore, we can finish the project very quickly and efficiently. However, if I work with people who have totally different ideas, we have to take a long time for both of us to adapt to each other. Unfortunately, it is a waste of time. Accordingly, we probably cannot submit the project on time. Obviously, working with members who think and work like me is a better decision.
Second, working with people who are similar to me is much helpful when we are thinking the ideas of the project. During the whole process, we could have amounts of nice communication together, if we think in similar ways. In this way, we are capable of coming up with some good ideas about how to deal with the project in a short time. It is sure that we can finish the project quite well and efficiently because of these wonderful ideas. On the contrary, if I decide to work with the person who is different from me, we might have some arguments about the project. In the end, we cannot even think up a good idea. As a result, choosing the similar members is wiser than choosing the members who have totally different thoughts.
As the two reasons mentioned above, it is clear to draw the conclusion that working with people who is similar to me will be more effective than people who is absolutely distinct from me.
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people take time to relax, they should enjoy hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work. 60
- In order to succeed in doing a new job the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvements for the quality of people’s lives have already taken place. 70
- If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course, which professor will you choose? The one whose course you used to sign up for or the one you have never learned from before? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49253731343 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43243106238 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465671641791 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1735465036 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6111111111 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394955607908 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140390061669 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123847168054 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269258658216 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624801480066 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.