Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.
-choose the members who think and work in similar ways
-choose the members who have totally different ideas
Which would you think is more effective to work with?”
In order to work much effectively, I prefer to select the members who think and work in similar ways. There are two reasons as follows.
First, I could save lots of time in this way, since we always think and work similarly. I do not need to spend some extra time explaining to each other about the reason why I work or think like this. In this case, we are able to have more time to do other important things of the project such as finding information on the Internet, reading some books in the library and stuff like that. Therefore, we could finish the project very quickly and efficiently. However, if I work with someone who have totally different ideas, we have to spend a long time making both of us get accustomed with each other. Unfortunately, it is a waste of time. Accordingly, we probably are disable to submit the project on time. Thus, working with people who is similar to me is a better decision.
Second, working with people who is similar as me is much helpful when we are thinking the ideas of the project. During the whole process, we could have a number of nice communication, if we think in similar ways. In this way, we are capable of coming up with some good ideas about how to deal with the project in a short time. It is obvious that we can finish the project quite well and efficiently because of these wonderful ideas. On the contrary, if I decide to work with the person who is distinguish from me, we might have some arguments on the project. In the end, we cannot even think up a good idea. We As a result, choosing the members who think and work like me is wiser than choosing the members who is different from me.
As the two reasons mentioned above, it is clear to draw the conclusion that working with people who is similar to me will be more effective than people who is absolutely distinct from me.
- Which one of the following do you think contributes the most to an enjoyable vacation? Good friends/Good location/Good food 70
- Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.-choose the members who think and work in similar ways-choose the members who have totally different ideasWhich would you think is more effective to work with? 60
- Some schools are now trying to focus on the education of science and technology, so they are reducing the time they spend on teaching students art and music. Do you think it's a good decision for schools to do this? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: nowadays people are more willing to rely on themselves and family help and less willing to rely on the government when they meet problems. 70
- tpo51 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 670, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disabled'.
Suggestion: disabled
...e of time. Accordingly, we probably are disable to submit the project on time. Thus, wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 494, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'distinguished'.
Suggestion: distinguished
...I decide to work with the person who is distinguish from me, we might have some arguments o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41520467836 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43694812956 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459064327485 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9248553856 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8888888889 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36473586057 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129130169547 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111887947923 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252513995888 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06458222012 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.