Both the passage and lecture talk about the authenticity of the European silver coin dated thousand years ago. The former asserts that the coin is fake while the latter contradicts each of its points. The arguments are as follows:
Firstly, The passage tells that the Norse settlement site and the archaeological site were located distinctly. The reading contradicts that many objects found at the archaeological site come from very distant places as Norse traveled largely across North America.
Furthermore, The author of the passage believes that no other coins were found at the Norse Canadian settlement. The lecturer counters by asserting that when Norse were planning to move to North America, they must have taken their valuables to America, but, while returning to Europe, they took all the coins leaving no other coins to be discovered at the archaeological site.
Finally, The author posits that Native Americans do not consider silver coins as money, and it is unnecessary for them. The lecturer challenges this argument by professing, Native Americans have an interest in unique items and find them attractive. The Norse must have traded silver coins with Native Americans as it can be used in necklaces and several different ornaments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eological site were located distinctly. The reading contradicts that many objects f...
^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...cans as it can be used in necklaces and several different ornaments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.265 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72759509458 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5160791499 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278535381782 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11099382055 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426769316472 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155736640276 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162810140785 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.