Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
I absolutely agree that teacher should be able to relate well with students than excellent knowledge of subject taught in class. To support my argument there are following reasons:
Generally, student are hesitant to ask questions to teacher and in every course structure there are certain topics which are difficult to grasp, if the teacher is capable to relate with the students condition, he will put more focus in conveying topics credentials in easy way or by giving mnemonics to understand well. When i was in 9th standard, trignometry was just introduced and every one in the class struggles with remembering values of sin,cos and tan, but, the maths instructor knows us well and gives us mnemonic to remember those values.
Another reason I believe that, being a teacher is not just about knowledge it's about transfering knowledge. I know professors in my college who are one of the best in there respective domain, but, when it comes to teaching they are very hard on students and monotonus. They use domain specific words which are not understood by students at lower level, Unability to relate with class condtions makes the subject boring and derails interest in subject.
After home most of the time students spend is with teachers. If the teacher has ability of being relatable then students can discuss the reason for stress and get some serious advice from experienced person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ving mnemonics to understand well. When i was in 9th standard, trignometry was ju...
^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , cos
...struggles with remembering values of sin,cos and tan, but, the maths instructor know...
^^^^
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...ing values of sin,cos and tan, but, the maths instructor knows us well and gives us m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...g a teacher is not just about knowledge its about transfering knowledge. I know pro...
^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...boring and derails interest in subject. After home most of the time students spend is...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...serious advice from experienced person.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 232.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01724137931 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60799728175 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 618.680645161 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5683881247 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379238551632 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163491752006 0.076458572812 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145562462102 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247576750831 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133565150271 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.