In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explorers known as the Norse, who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean and came into contact with Native Americans almost a thousand years ago.
However, some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake; they think that the coin was placed at the site recently by someone who wanted to mislead the public. There are three main reasons why some archaeologists believe that the coin is not genuine historical evidence.
The reading passage and the lecture talk about a European silver coin related to an explorer, Norse. Despite that, the professor states that the silver coin is not a historical fake but a genuine evidence. She casts doubt every single point the reading makes and provides explanations in the lecture to support her idea.
To begin with, the reading passage states the location where the coin found is a long distance from North Settlements, this evidence suggests there is no real connection between the coin and the settlement. However, the speaker claims the coin may be brought to the location when Norse travelled. Other finding were also discovered where far away from the settlement. Therefore, the professor can not give a nod to the author in terms of the first point.
Secondly, about no other coins found, the writer thinks the evidence indicates that Norse did not bring any silver coins whereas the lecturer holds the view that Norse could packed up all the valuable things back to the Europe so that they could not find the other coins. Apparently, the speaker's argument disproves the counterpart in the reading.
In addition, the writer in the reading mentions silver coin is useless in North America. The professor, on the other hand, argues silver coin is an unusual object. People in North America may appreciate its beauty and feel it appealing as other necklace or jewelry stuffs. The silver coin can be used for trading if the people think it is beautiful.
In conclusion, it is clear that the author and the professor hold conflicting views on this subject. They will have difficulties finding common ground on this topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Zmx_6 | 85 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 85
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a method of 78
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 70
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 61
- Some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'pack'
Suggestion: pack
...ecturer holds the view that Norse could packed up all the valuable things back to the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...t find the other coins. Apparently, the speakers argument disproves the counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97833935018 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48914807718 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.3110383706 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211864780591 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709155129271 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605994964087 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107955841438 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688658096309 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.