In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars.First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiry fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. Like Earth bacteria, the meteorite fossils aretube-like and segmented (i.e, composed of little segments or sections).Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Thee compounds are molecules with guite acomplicated structure. On Earth such compounds often arise when simple organisms like bacteria decompose Thus the best explanation of the compounds on themeteorite is that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars.Thirc. researchers discovered crains of macnette la maanetic mineral) in the meteorte that are similar to macnetite crains produced by bacteria on Earth. Earthbacteria use such maonetic grains as a sort of compass to navicate their movement using Earth's macnetic feld. The grains on the Martian meteorite are vensimiar in size. shape. and stucture to those proouced oy Earth bacteria. which makes it likey that they have been oroduced by bacteria on Mars.
The arthur mentions that a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that came to Earth from the planet Mars. In addition, the discovery was very exciting because several characteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars. However, the professor do not agree with these three opinions.
First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiny fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. The professor opposes that it will miss something important. For example, the region preparion is a sample and also a way which will cause some changes.
Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Whereas, the professor thinks that the best explanation of the compounds on the meteorite is not that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars. For example, some compounds can not produce.
Third, researchers discovered grains of magnetite in the meteorite that are similar to magnetite grains produced by bacteria on Earth. It is really weak to follow and it is useless to make it likely thast they have been produced by bacteria on Mars. We don't have enough information to ensure the success of the plan.
All in all, the whole passage is used to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | view | |
| 2023-07-27 | Sheraleelyle | 80 | view |
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 85
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 70
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 78
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 83
- In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not agree with these three opinions. First, under an electron microscope, one...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a way which will cause some changes. Second, scientists found special chemica...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that appear to be of bacterial origin. Whereas, the professor thinks that the best exp...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mple, some compounds can not produce. Third, researchers discovered grains of ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e been produced by bacteria on Mars. We dont have enough information to ensure the s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on to ensure the success of the plan. All in all, the whole passage is used to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, third, whereas, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10407239819 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75712314856 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.449953786 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7692307692 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250430284692 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751392666178 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910698717248 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115351004935 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840711534699 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not agree with these three opinions. First, under an electron microscope, one...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a way which will cause some changes. Second, scientists found special chemica...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that appear to be of bacterial origin. Whereas, the professor thinks that the best exp...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mple, some compounds can not produce. Third, researchers discovered grains of ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e been produced by bacteria on Mars. We dont have enough information to ensure the s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on to ensure the success of the plan. All in all, the whole passage is used to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, third, whereas, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10407239819 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75712314856 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.449953786 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7692307692 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250430284692 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751392666178 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910698717248 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115351004935 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840711534699 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.