In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life forms on Mars First under an electron microscope one can see tiry foss

Essay topics:

In 1984 a team of researchers found a meteorite in Antarctica that cameto Earthfromexcitingbecause severaplanetdiscovervcharacteristics of the meteorite suggested the existence of life-forms on Mars.First, under an electron microscope, one can see tiry fossils on the meteorite with shapes similar to Earth bacteria. Like Earth bacteria, the meteorite fossils aretube-like and segmented (i.e, composed of little segments or sections).Second, scientists found special chemical compounds in the meteorite that appear to be of bacterial origin. Thee compounds are molecules with guite acomplicated structure. On Earth such compounds often arise when simple organisms like bacteria decompose Thus the best explanation of the compounds on themeteorite is that they formed from similar decomposing organisms on Mars.Thirc. researchers discovered crains of macnette la maanetic mineral) in the meteorte that are similar to macnetite crains produced by bacteria on Earth. Earthbacteria use such maonetic grains as a sort of compass to navicate their movement using Earth's macnetic feld. The grains on the Martian meteorite are vensimiar in size. shape. and stucture to those proouced oy Earth bacteria. which makes it likey that they have been oroduced by bacteria on Mars.

The lecture and the reading both talks about discovery about there might be life forms on Mars, while the reading material strongly believes that there is life form by giving 3 point, the lecturer thinks thatit is not convincing by giving 3 points that are against the 3 points mentioned by the passage.
First, according to the author of the reading passage, under an electron microscope, they can see tiny fossils which shapes very similar to the bacterias on Earth, which could be tube-liked and segmented. But the listening argues that even though it looks like, this could be misleading, this may not look like how it originally looked like, when preparing for a electron microscope to see, the fossil may be changed artificialy, for example, the fossil may look like segmented but it is not originally segmented, and these are not real characteritics
Secondly, the writer believes that the special chemical compounds found on the meteiorites seem very similar to the compunds from the decomposition of Earth's bacteria. The professor completely disagrees with this point by mentioning that these compounds are not produced nor decomposed, it is more like from volcanoes, which could be Mars' volcanic activities.
Lastly, the passage writes that the grains of magnetite is found on the meteorite that is very similar to the ones produced by Earth bacterias that furthermore suggest that there is life on Mars. On the other hand, the man challenges the material by mentioning Earth bacteria have grains of magnetite because of Earth's magnetic field which they need to follow, but Mars' magnetic field is too weak to follow and the minerals are not from bacterial is probably from other non living sources.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 85 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 78 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 83 view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle view
2023-07-27 Sheraleelyle 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sheraleelyle :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ginally looked like, when preparing for a electron microscope to see, the fossil ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0780141844 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66265542585 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528368794326 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 21.2450331126 221% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.457285159 49.2860985944 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 238.666666667 110.228320801 217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.0 21.698381199 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.8333333333 7.06452816374 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128660954729 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710402684394 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554988843386 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656926156769 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229823364538 0.0443174109184 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.0 13.3589403974 195% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.23 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.4 11.0289183223 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.498013245 198% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.