47W1
In the reading passage, the writer introduces a kind of ancient animal called Pterosaur, and in the writer’s opinion, this animal was incapable to fly for three reasons. However, the professor argues that the pterosaurs could fly with three pieces of evidence.
For the first, the viewpoint that the pterosaurs were the cold-blood animal of the reading passage is against by the professor in the lecture. The professor mentions that the fossils of pterosaurs can find some construction like dense, hair-like stuff, which might be the fur of the pterosaurs to protect themselves and to store the heat when the weather was cold. This evidence means that the pterosaurs were a warm-blood animal, and also had enough energy to fly.
And second, the passage says that the pterosaurs were so big and too heaved to fly, but the professor has a different idea. The pterosaurs had features that made them light for their size. For example, the bones of pterosaurs were hollow, which can make their weight lighter than they seemed to be. Thus, the size is not a piece of evidence to prove that pterosaurs were so heaved to fly.
Finally, the reading passage states that the back legs muscles of pterosaurs were too small and weak, which could not help them to run fast or jump high to leave the ground. However, the professor mentions that the pterosaurs weren’t like birds; they have four legs to help them take off from the ground, and these legs were powered enough for them to run fast or jump high to fly up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | Angelina2016 | 3 | view |
- Even though many people from different countries care about environment problems pollution and global warming the environmental situation cannot be improved in the future 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require every graduation students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- TPO10 Integrated Writing 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that it is a good quality for a person. 80
- TPO6-W1 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80152671756 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46254205988 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496183206107 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4674021294 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.