It is better to finish a project completely and then do another project than do two or more projects at the same time.
In the wake of greater intensity of modern work and study, people are busy dealing with a variety of projects every day. The approaches to tackle projects vary from one person to another. Some prefer to handle the projects one by one, while others are big fans of multi-tasking. From my perspective, the ability to concentrate on one project at a time means a lot to us. In the following paragraphs, I am going to elaborate my point of view.
Firstly, focusing on a single project at a time is more time-saving. Since we devote our mind to the sole task, the time on converting our thoughts among different projects can be eliminated. In addition to that, we do not have to check the earlier part of the projects and load the progress. For instance, last semester, I needed to write three proposals belonging to different courses at the same time. I chose to finish them one by one, while my roommate got down to them in the meantime. Finally, I got my work done before the deadline, but she did not hand in the proposals on time because she wasted too much time on changing her train of thoughts from one course to another. So, once we immerse ourselves in a task, we can reach high working efficiency and get the work done quickly.
Secondly, single-tasking can lead to better results. As we all know, our ability to solve problems and our energy to think deeply are limited, which means it is easier for people to meet high working quality with no disturbance around. Supposed that there are several projects waiting for us to complete simultaneously, it will certainly impose huge pressure on us and make us slide into chaos. Correspondingly, our attention will be easily torn apart thus making us unable to concentrate on the current task. Consequently, it will not only lead to low work efficiency but also bring about plenty of mistakes difficult to be discovered and corrected.
What’s more, doing one project at a time is conducive to people’s positive state of mind. According to our experience, completing a task can enhance our sense of achievement and satisfaction, thus endow us with a cheerful mood which makes our more energetic to finish the subsequent projects. However, during multi-tasking, we usually work for a long time but are not able to totally complete any project. If that is the case, our motivation, morale, and enthusiasm will gradually wear thin. As a result, single-tasking can better help us with an optimistic attitude. In a nutshell, people can work more efficiently and with higher quality by doing projects one after another than by multi-tasking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | HHH321 | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | HHH321 | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | Petros Tepoyan | 63 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | Angelina2016 | 90 | view |
| 2018-11-08 | Pinn | 73 | view |
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you ch 70
- TPO42 Integrated Writing 86
- 30-W1 3
- Even though many people from different countries care about environment problems pollution and global warming the environmental situation cannot be improved in the future 95
- TPO60 integrated writing 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84080717489 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91261128722 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544843049327 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4331767086 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8695652174 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306232625222 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947373799019 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924301864567 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192151260353 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884314265368 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.