According to the reading passage, it is stated that since the negatives, which are of landscape scenes of the western united states and dated from 1920s, have no indication of the name of their photographer, most people believe that they are took by Ansel Adams; and it provides the reasons to support this hypothesis. However, the lecturer refutes the assumptions made in the reading passage, and presents three solid reasons to challenge these proposals.
Firstly, the reading claims that those negatives contain images of landscape features like a large leaning pine tree that are known to be taken by Ansel Adams. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that leaning tree is not a random tree. He states that tree was one of the famous landmarks in a park, which attracted most photographers who visited that site, and most of them took picture of it.
Secondly, the article posits that there is a mark of handwritten place names which resemble the handwritten of Virginia, Adams' wife, who is known to have assisted Ansel in his work. In contrast, the professor says that since Virginia Adams' father was a well-known photographer at the Usembles city, she knew there very well. Therefore, it is not likely for her to misspell that place's name.
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
- Advantages of Airships over other aircrafts Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories presented in the reading passage 80
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric pre 65
- The reading and lecture are both about the project assembled by a team The author of the reading states that work can be done effeciently in a group The lecturer disagrees He mentions involving people means creation of distinct ideas which could make work 76
- TPO 46Question Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to old 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...pher, most people believe that they are took by Ansel Adams; and it provides the rea...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons to challenge these proposals. Firstly, the reading claims that those n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and most of them took picture of it. Secondly, the article posits that there ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92488262911 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5671522919 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8925242885 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190655770673 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632219771537 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631315530385 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109721977208 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667825480712 0.0443174109184 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.