The reading and lecture are both about the project assembled by a team The author of the reading states that work can be done effeciently in a group The lecturer disagrees He mentions involving people means creation of distinct ideas which could make work

The reading and the lecture are both about the how efficient teamwork can be in approaching new projects. While the author of the article argues that the best way for it is to gather a group of people into a team , The lecturer disputes the claims mentioned in the article. His position is that , projects done by a team may be more probable to fail in contrast to the projects done by an individual.
According to the article , a work done by a team can finish more quickly due to the number of individuals which possess greater resources. This article is challenged by the lecturer who gives an example of a company that decided to allocate one of its projects to a team. He claims that project didn't finish quickly cause it took the team members so long to reach a consensus. Additionally he points out that , when after six months members were asked about how well they were doing , their attitude was just opposite of what is mentioned in the reading.
Secondly , the author suggests that , individuals would have a better chance to get their opinions recognized as highly considerable in a team and members who are great in desicion-making will feel better about carrying out the work. The lecturer , however asserts that , again in the example of the company , while one or two individuals that were so influential dropped some ideas and the team decided to put them into practice , a highly creative member warn them but they ignored his directions. He goes on to say that , in consequence not only the project failed , but also there was blame on all member's faces.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
... reading and the lecture are both about the how efficient teamwork can be in approachin...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to gather a group of people into a team , The lecturer disputes the claims mentio...
^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ned in the article. His position is that , projects done by a team may be more pro...
^^
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...an individual. According to the article , a work done by a team can finish more q...
^^
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...jects to a team. He claims that project didnt finish quickly cause it took the team m...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...m members so long to reach a consensus. Additionally he points out that , when after six mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nsensus. Additionally he points out that , when after six months members were aske...
^^
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ere asked about how well they were doing , their attitude was just opposite of wha...
^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t is mentioned in the reading. Secondly , the author suggests that , individuals ...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng. Secondly , the author suggests that , individuals would have a better chance ...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...members who are great in desicion-making will feel better about carrying out the ...
^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bout carrying out the work. The lecturer , however asserts that , again in the exa...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ork. The lecturer , however asserts that , again in the example of the company , w...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at , again in the example of the company , while one or two individuals that were ...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e team decided to put them into practice , a highly creative member warn them but ...
^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d his directions. He goes on to say that , in consequence not only the project fai...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... consequence not only the project failed , but also there was blame on all members...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69454545455 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63363649436 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549090909091 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1827557724 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 17.0 4.19205298013 406% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300854223249 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113508095592 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589695675864 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208037931697 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849363767306 0.0443174109184 192% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.