are negatives of photographs ansel adams work or not

According to the reading passage, it is stated that since the negatives, which are of landscape scenes of the western united states and dated from 1920s, have no indication of the name of their photographer, most people believe that they are took by Ansel Adams; and it provides the reasons to support this hypothesis. However, the lecturer refutes the assumptions made in the reading passage, and presents three solid reasons to challenge these proposals.
Firstly, the reading claims that those negatives contain images of landscape features like a large leaning pine tree that are known to be taken by Ansel Adams. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that leaning tree is not a random tree. He states that tree was one of the famous landmarks in a park, which attracted most photographers who visited that site, and most of them took picture of it.
Secondly, the article posits that there is a mark of handwritten place names which resemble the handwritten of Virginia, Adams' wife, who is known to have assisted Ansel in his work. In contrast, the professor says that since Virginia Adams' father was a well-known photographer at the Usembles city, she knew there very well. Therefore, it is not likely for her to misspell that place's name.
Finally, the reading says that a number of negatives have been damaged by fire, leading to the assumption that they once belonged to Adams' photography studio, which had caught a fire. The professor disagrees, explaining that traditional photography studios used dangerous chemicals that could easily catch fire. According to him, not only Ansel Adams but also a great number of other photographers encountered such things. Therefore, those negatives can not be exclusive to Adams.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...pher, most people believe that they are took by Ansel Adams; and it provides the rea...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons to challenge these proposals. Firstly, the reading claims that those n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and most of them took picture of it. Secondly, the article posits that there ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66491988745 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7598218266 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258159697243 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787964129568 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745038005387 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136419858267 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740490520141 0.0443174109184 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.