The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that when Austen died her family gave the permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that in that portrait is not Austen because she was elder than 17 years when she died. Apart from that, the girl in the portrait does not correspond with the age of the Austen.
The second argument the author gives is that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the Cassandra's sketch, which communicate definite details about Austen's face. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the Austen's family was a big family the possibility of given one of the portraits of her cousins is high. Actually, the family could have given her nice portrait instead.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the painter who painted the portrait was linked with Ozias style. Even though, the signature was missing. The family would hire one of the most famous painter. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that only because was his style it does not prove that is painted by him. Additionally, the seller of the portrait start selling when Austen was 27 years old at that time. So, the timing did not correspond with the age of the girl in the picture.
Although, the text suggests three reasons in supporting the Austen portrait, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive..
.
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about Jane Austen's picture actually her photo or not. The article strongly postulates that it was certainly her painting because her family members titled it was Jane Austen, the most well-known writer of English novels. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that it is not persuasive because it hasn't proved that it was her due to several compelling reasons.<br>First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that in 1882 after several years Austen's death her parents allowed using the portrait as her resemblance of letters and today her family have still agreed that that subject of the photo is Jane Austen. Nonetheless, The professor offsets these points by declaring that after 17 years of her grave it was permitted also her family has never seen her before so it means that they don't know about it much.<br>On top of this, The professor in the listening elaborates by bringing up the point that the portrait resembles her distance niece due to fact that she has had many female cousins and nieces who are same age like her during that time. These claims refute the writer's implications which about it draws her face accurately and elaborately also it is so akin to the Cassandra sketch. <br>The text lastly insists that her family hires Ozias Humphrey who is the main painter of this family and that portrait very alike to his style. The speaker in the lecture counters these indications by asserting that the portrait has own blank canvas indicates the precise date which was painted also that year Jane is 27 years old young girl older than a depicted teenager on the portrait. <br>
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- The administrators of a university are revising their budget and have decided to change their funding priorities As a result the university will now spend more money on sports and athletic facilities than they do on the campus libraries Do you think this 89
- integrated essay tpo19 88
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing TaskThe cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful i 85
- TPO 26 - The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it po 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...es that it is not persuasive because it hasnt proved that it was her due to several c...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 874, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r seen her before so it means that they dont know about it much.
On top of this, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, lastly, nonetheless, so, still, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91197183099 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51810297461 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 21.2450331126 188% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 125.401559083 49.2860985944 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 199.285714286 110.228320801 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.5714285714 21.698381199 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131630765102 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721937513259 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378357216744 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131630765102 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.3589403974 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 53.8541721854 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.09 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.498013245 171% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.