The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that when Austen died her family gave the permission to use the portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letters. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that in that portrait is not Austen because she was elder than 17 years when she died. Apart from that, the girl in the portrait does not correspond with the age of the Austen.
The second argument the author gives is that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the Cassandra's sketch, which communicate definite details about Austen's face. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that the Austen's family was a big family the possibility of given one of the portraits of her cousins is high. Actually, the family could have given her nice portrait instead.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that the painter who painted the portrait was linked with Ozias style. Even though, the signature was missing. The family would hire one of the most famous painter. Nevertheless, the professor declaring that only because was his style it does not prove that is painted by him. Additionally, the seller of the portrait start selling when Austen was 27 years old at that time. So, the timing did not correspond with the age of the girl in the picture.
Although, the text suggests three reasons in supporting the Austen portrait, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive..
.
Both the author and the lecturer discuss even if the portrait that is linked to jane austen is a real portrait of her or not. The author believes that the painting is an exact portrait of austen and provides three specific reasons in support. The lecturer, though, finds these points not convincing and repudiates them all.
First, the author argues that austen family recognized the painting as a portrait of jane by allowing the publisher to depict it in an edition of her letter. The lecturer, however, believes that in 1882 jane austen has been dead for almost seven decades and none of people that gave the permission had seen her themselves.
Secondly, the author states that the face in the painting resembles to an amateurish sketch, which we know is austen image. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this claim by clarifying the point that austen's family was very large and someone else could be resemble to jane, maybe it is person who was a distant niece of jane austen.
Finally, the author mentions that although there is no date and sign on the picture, considering the time it had been painted when austen was a teenager. Contradictory, the lecturer dismisses this point due to the fact that later date blank shows that is was sold by a man named William Leg and it's related to the time that jane was 27 years old, which means that at that time jane austen was clearly older than the portrait.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away: 2. Wait until the class or meet 3
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need. If you could give money toonly one type of charitable organization, which one of the following would you choose and why?- An organization that provides food and housing to people in 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 73
- The author states about the reasons that show that the teenage girl in the portrait did belong to Jane Austen. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter-argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.First and foremos 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...e fact that later date blank shows that is was sold by a man named William Leg and...
^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...act that later date blank shows that is was sold by a man named William Leg and its...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.696 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35932193649 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6034824739 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.444444444 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22706319317 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101359615637 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557799505069 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143249462421 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502070148086 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.