Both writer and speaker focus on employee working day, but express opposing viewpoint. whereas the author argues that employees should work four days a week, the professor disagrees and states that employees should work five days a week for eight hours each day.
Firstly, according to the text, the writer mentions that shortened workweek will increase company income as they would feel relaxing. therefore, they would make fewer mistake in their work. On the other hand, the speaker saids that four-day workweek will force firm to spend more money. The company have to add more employees. As a result, the company have to buy more computers, and rent more space.
Moreover, the reading mentions that the primary advantages of four-day work week would decrease unemployment rates. On the contrary, the lecturer saids that it will have more job available and the firm have to ask employees to work overtime.
Finally, according to the passage, the author states that the shortened workweek would improve the quality of their lives. However, the professor argues that it will decrease job ability. In addition, it will pass over promotion
Both writer and speaker focus on employee working day, but express opposing viewpoint. whereas the author argues that employees should work four days a week, the professor disagrees and states that employees should work five days a week for eight hours each day.
Firstly, according to the text, the writer mentions that shortened workweek will increase company income as they would feel relaxing. therefore, they would make fewer mistake in their work. On the other hand, the speaker said that four-day workweek will force firm to spend more money. The company have to add more employees. As a result, the company have to buy more computers, and rent more space.
Moreover, the reading mentions that the primary advantages of four-day work week would decrease unemployment rates. On the contrary, the lecturer said that it will have more job available and the firm have to ask employees to work overtime.
Finally, according to the passage, the author states that the shortened workweek would improve the quality of their lives. However, the professor argues that it will decrease job ability. In addition, it will pass over promotion
- TPO3 - Integrated Writing 3
- Both writer and speaker focus on employee working day, but express opposing viewpoint. whereas the author argues that employees should work four days a week, the professor disagrees and states that employees should work five days a week for eight hours ea 60
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 60
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 3
- . 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ng day, but express opposing viewpoint. whereas the author argues that employees should...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...any income as they would feel relaxing. therefore, they would make fewer mistake in their...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 185.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23783783784 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39158495511 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545945945946 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8653114318 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505373126961 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170433787926 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.252017991265 0.0662205650399 381% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333066131214 0.162205337803 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.368130339996 0.0443174109184 831% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.