Chaco buildings were residential
The passage provided three theory, in which the probable primary usage of Chaco Building has been explained. The professor at the lecture provided some reasons which cast doubt on all of the mentioned theory in the reading. The summary of points in the lecture has been provided as follow.
First, the article suggested that these buildings were for residential purposes, however, at the lecture it is noticed that these building from outside were similar to an apartment building and not from inside. Inside of these building has a fewer flaming spot for cooking matters, therefore this hypothesis is rejected.
Second, the reading claimed that maybe these structures were used for food storage. But, the professor at his speech disagreed with this idea as the maize should find in the first story more.
Third, as the lecture said, the suggestion that these structures used as ceremonial centers was not true because the evidence of left pots and meal could be for the labors who worked there
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Sina-ss | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | tamir052222 | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-08 | shirin Mozaffari | 86 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ovided some reasons which cast doubt on all of the mentioned theory in the reading. The su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of the mentioned theory in the reading. The summary of points in the lecture has be...
^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...points in the lecture has been provided as follow. First, the article suggested that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could be for the labors who worked there
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 165.0 270.72406181 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13939393939 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38933965466 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7920933492 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252680053709 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863142141714 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11727797914 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114333771446 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11952979936 0.0443174109184 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.