Chaveliar memoir
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss about chevalier de Seingalt's memoir about his autobiography. Whereas the author feels that the memoir may not be accurate in its story, the lecturer challenges the claim made by the author and states that the article's explanation is faulty. The three points which
shows
doubts about the memoir in the article is refuted by the lecture.
Firstly, according to the reading part, there are proves about chevalier lending huge amount of money from a Swiss merchant. The article raises question about chevalier being rich as a rich man is unlikely to borrow money from others. However, in ther lecture, chevalier's taking loan froma merchant is justified by the point that he had wealths which are fixed assets and not cash money. Moreover, as he was addicted to gambling and partying, it is very likely that he spent all his money there and ran out of cash money. As it takes certain period of time to sell properties, he prefered borrowing the money and compensate later.
Secondly, the article
shows
doubt on the fact that the conversation between chavelier and Voltaire is not exactly as mentioned in the memoire. As the memoire was written after many years from the event, it is unlikely to capture all the conversations. On contrary, the lecture refutes the idea by stating that he used to write down on a daily basis about his events. Additionally, witnesses supported the idea that he used his notes and journals for writing the memoir which is why conversations can be captured even after so many years.
Finally, the author is skeptical about the event where chavelier escaped from the jail by making a hole in Italy. As he had quite good connection with the politicians, he could easily get a bail by offering bribe. On the other hand, the lecture denies the idea by arguing that there are other prisoners there who also had good political connection, yet they could not manage a bail through bribing. Furthermore, the government's old documents
show
that the ceiling had to be repaired immediately after chavelier's leave which advocates that the event was real.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 83
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeingof the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe thatthe only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is tomake as muc 66
- TPO 02 Integrated Writing Task In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people 70
- It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas What most people find difficult however is accepting the way these new ideas are put into practice 66
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
... made by the author and states that the articles explanation is faulty. The three points...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... out of cash money. As it takes certain period of time to sell properties, he prefered borrowi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95821727019 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58575352764 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545961002786 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5940744517 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.25 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871031641036 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340020977341 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513562630065 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572573832456 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695989966547 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.