clay jar used as batteries in iraq
The reading and the lecturer are both about that clay jars which was with copper cylinder surrounding an iron road, and discovered by villagers of Iraq in 1938 The author of reading believes that it was not likely to that vessels were actually used in electronic batteries. The lecturer effectively casts doubt on claims made in lecturer. He says that vessels were electronic batteries which can produce electric current.
First of all, the author claims that vessels would probably attached with wires, but no wires were found on excavation site. This point is challenged by the lecturer. he thinks that it was found by villagers, so they were not masters as archeologist. They did not find it very important or overlooked as an uninteresting. There are might chances that they had thrown it away by considering unimportant.
Secondly, the author states that copper cylinder inside the jar exactly look like copper cylinders discovered in the ruins of Seleucia, and they used it for holding the scrolls of sacred texts not electricity. The lecturer refutes this point by asserting that it is true that cylinder use as a scroll, but there are chances that they start to use it for another purpose. Their purpose was to adapt the another use by same thing.
Thirdly, the author mentions that at ancient time no devices were there to rely on the electricity, so it was useless for them. The lecturer opposes this point and thinks that they used it as a show magic to someone else. They felt tingling sensation invisibly. An ancient doctor used it as a medicine, since in modern era doctors use electric current to relieve muscle pain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'attach'
Suggestion: attach
...thor claims that vessels would probably attached with wires, but no wires were found on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...is point is challenged by the lecturer. he thinks that it was found by villagers, ...
^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...find it very important or overlooked as an uninteresting. There are might chances that they had ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e another use by same thing. Thirdly, the author mentions that at ancient time...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92086330935 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59135652054 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.3703633325 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205055451093 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515852262467 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622873581132 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114474321814 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765790526515 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.