Torreya in Florida becoming an extinct
The reading and the lecture are both about Torreya tree which is common in the state of Florida, and its population will extinct soon. The author of the reading passage gives three ways to save the Torreya trees. The lecturer effectively casts doubt on the points made in the reading. He says that these solutions are not satisfactory.
First of all, the author states that reestablish the trees in the same location in which they thrived for several years in the Northern part of Florida. They have a cooler climate than the surrounding area, scientists have been working over there. The lecturer refutes this point and asserts that A microclimate easily affected by the climate changes. Additionally, land of the Florida draining and global warming is affecting the land. Therefore, the land will become relatively drier, so this is not an appropriate option.
Secondly, the author states that to move them to a different area in further north. Humans would simply move it in a cool environment. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that humans have tried to move other trees over different areas. That new trees had killed the other trees in the new area, and after that, the native trees became extinct. so, the new experiment could bring unpredictable results.
Finally, the author mentions that the seeds and saplings can be moved in a closely monitored environment in research centers. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that research centers have not capacity to keep a large population of these trees. Their population is very large and diverse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three ways to save the Torreya trees. The lecturer effectively casts doubt on the...
^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... that, the native trees became extinct. so, the new experiment could bring unpredi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03802281369 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57345077173 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7044608771 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.6111111111 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6111111111 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155856254014 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360655456764 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620711994442 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811226502755 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706356430025 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.