Construction of Artificial Reefs
Both the reading article and lecture discusses about the implications of implementation of artificial reefs (rigid structures that affords survival for diverse fish types) on the ocean sources. While the author suggests that such reefs are highly beneficial discussing about three specific advantages, the speaker challenges the proposition made by author. In his opinion, the problems caused by such structure outweighs their benefits to a great extent. It will be discussed in detail in the following paragraphs.
The author, in the reading, begins with mentioning that the small-scale farmers will be get profited from the particular plan as they are better known about the secret locations where reefs can be constructed. Admittedly, it will help them to thrive against the large-scale competitors; however, the lecturer confutes the position presented by the author. He says that such activity will jeopardize the safety system of the oceans: when such hard structures are not caught on the oceans, then others will be unknown about it resulting in negative consequences such as large-scale farmers net will get tucked and get damaged as well as boat may crash colliding with reefs. Thus, he suggests that they should be made known to public which ultimately work against the favor of small-scaled farmers which completely falsifies the claim made by author.
The writer further asserts that there will be greater increase in the population of fishes with the construction of such reefs. The speaker questions the position made by the author. He points out that the increment in the number of fish is falsely interpreted here. Since, the main purpose of the reefs is to attract the fish, it will just allocated them at one location rather than increasing the number. He further asserts that this described situation results in decrease in the fish population as the farmers will get access to more fishing maintaining imbalance on the fish population.
The reading article, finally, posits that reefs construction will surely assist the proper recycling or reusing process. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer maintains that such structures will not be efficacious. He corroborates his statement by providing an example of artificial reefs constructed in the ocean. When a reef constructed by binding tire materials were used in an ocean, they were separated by the strong force of wind. Consequently, the diverse population of marine ecosystem--including plants and animals--were harmed.
To summarize, the author and speaker holds opposite views on favorability of the application of artificial reefs which will be difficult for both of them on finding common ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | kevin1105 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | nikki07hung | 3 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | HSNDEK | 52 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 3 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | jimHsu | 65 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...g or reusing process. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer maintains that su...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 30.3222958057 191% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1373.03311258 166% => OK
No of words: 423.0 270.72406181 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37825059102 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94912685856 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 145.348785872 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529550827423 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 419.366225166 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7100565962 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.736842105 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210970564705 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074221387237 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10372790026 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143502111037 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106513800643 0.0443174109184 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 63.6247240618 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.