The decrease in population of sea otters in Alaskan.
Both the passage and lecture discuss about sea otters.
While the passage says that the sea otter population started declining rapidly due to environmental pollution or attacks by predators the lecture disagrees to that.
First, the passage claims that the pollution is likely the cause that their source such as oil rigs, other source of industrial chemical pollution, and increase level of chemicals in water cause the deaths of otters.
However, the lecture insists that more than pollution predations the most likely cause of decline population of otter. If they would have died cause of the pollution then they would have found the dead bodies, but there are none.
Next, the passage asserts that other mammals such as seals and sea lions were also declining with the same cause as the otters this again points to environmental pollution which effects the entire ecosystem. The orca predators don’t get the affected cause the survive on other whales.
In contrast, the lecture argues that orca predator eats other whales, and the whales have disappeared Alaskan coast because of humans. And so maybe the orca has changed their diet with other mammals.
Finally, the passage states that scientists believe that the pollution hypothesis could explain the uneven pattern of decline of otter at Alaskan cause of current or environmental factors. While some remain stable in population.
On the other hand, the lecture points out that the orca predator whales who rely on whether the most on is the location is accessible or not. They are so big that they can’t access the shallow or rock locations and these are the location where the otter where they hide. So maybe this could be the reason of uneven decline of otter population not pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-04 | cc919 | 93 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | varuninamdar | 3 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | Shrushti Krishna Vishwasrao | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | Hah1 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Having children is less important than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 76
- Television advertising directed towards children from 1 year to 5 years should be banned Do you agree or disagree 70
- In order to became financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Do you agree or disagree 76
- Children should not be allowed to play computer games Do you agree or disagree 91
- The decrease in population of sea otters in Alaskan 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had died'?
Suggestion: had died
...of decline population of otter. If they would have died cause of the pollution then they would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... predators don’t get the affected cause the survive on other whales. In contrast, the lect...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... changed their diet with other mammals. Finally, the passage states that scienti...
^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...se of current or environmental factors. While some remain stable in population. On t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08650519031 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39717229842 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1080268669 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183834107559 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669052100096 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686977704095 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894288725517 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545705176597 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.