Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in the state of Arizona in the southwestern United States. However, many skeptics doubt that the structures were created by bees. The skeptics support their view with several arguments.
The article states that several skeptics' arguments about the old fossil that referred to bees support the idea that this structure was not created by bees and provide three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that not only is it possible that the bees made this structure perfectly, but is the theory unconvincing as well, and refutes each author's reasons.
First of all, the reading states that the preserved bee fossil has shown 100 million years old thereby, the 200 million years fossil is nothing to do with the bees nest. The professor refutes this point by stating that the fossil might have been to bees since the probability of other Resin material's existence strengthened bee 200 million years ago.
Second, the article claims that the flowering plant did not live 200 years ago. Given the bees' close association with flowering plants, unlikely bees could have existed before that time. However, the professor contends that the bees might feed on other non-flowering plants such as pine trees; hence, the bees might have adopted to feed after evolving the flowering plant.
Third, the reading avers that Given the bee nest was made by other insects, such as wood-boring beetles, lack caps for the fossilized chamber. the professor opposes this point by declaring that chemical cap has a unique characteristic in which by using the chemical analysis can recognize spiral caps material in such fossil caps found 200 million years ago
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
..., lack caps for the fossilized chamber. the professor opposes this point by declari...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, then, third, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09166666667 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40566461133 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1873167581 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.777777778 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44392758163 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187392034548 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10100537492 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260566668028 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113313998307 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.