European silver coins which found on the site in state Maine.
The reading and the lecturer are both about finding some silver coins in the Native American archeological site in the state of Maine. The author of the reading feels that these silver coins are not from the European explorers who came to America, but they are from some people who wanted to make archeologists into the trouble and they are fake. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. She states that those silver coins on the site are not fake, and they are the history of American people from thousands of years ago.
To begin with, the reading argues that this site in the state of Maine is far from the place where the Norse was there in North America. In the article, it is said that the distance from the Maine site to the Norse settlement in Canada is approximately more than a thousand kilometers. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that some other things were on the site, too. Additionally, she says that the Norse traveled to North Canada, and they brought back coins to the site in state Maine.
Secondly, the author of the reading states that there were not any other coins in the Canadian sites from the Norse. It is also said that they did not bring any silver coins to North American. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that Norse explorers went back to Europe, and they packed up with themselves, enormous valuable things like a silver coin.
Finally, the reading posits that the Norse people understood that those specific coins are useless in North America. The article also said that silver coins were common in European countries. The lecturer elaborates on this by bringing up an explanation. She says that silver was so beautiful around the world. As a result, everyone used in jewelry, and Native American tried to use them to trade with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Zmx_6 | 85 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sts into the trouble and they are fake. The lecturer challenged the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.740625 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35687160236 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446875 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3290163492 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2352941176 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315514019231 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108606350142 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938533992313 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205561039591 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542276757591 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.