hgh
Both the reading and the lecture are about the correct function of a set of clay jars discovered in Iraq in the past. The reading passage, by means of presenting three major reasons, claims that it is not probable that these vessels were used as electric batteries. The professor, however, refutes all of the evidence stated by the text, mentioning that the argument posited by reading is not convincing, and they are not well presented.
First of all, the author brings up the idea that since the vessels did not attach any electrical conductors like metal wires, they were not used as electric batteries. This specific argument is challenged by the professor that the vessels were found by local people, not archeologists. So probably they have discovered other materials near the jars, but, since they have not recognized their importance or they might seem uninteresting to them, they have thrown them away.
Secondly, in the article it is said that, copper cylinders inside the jars were similar to those found in Seleucia, representing that they were used for holding scrolls not as batteries. The speaker, in contrast, states that, although they exactly looked like each other, but, this does not prove anything. She explains that it is possible that those copper cylinders were designed to preserve scrolls, but some ancient investors discovered later that they can fill the jars with liquid and use them as batteries by producing electricity. Actually, that time was the first time that human being was able to produce electricity. She then, mentions that, at first people made and used clay jars as preservers for sacred texts, but then they adapted for another purpose.
At last, the essay underlines the fact that ancient people had no devices that relied on electricity, and these batteries were useless to them. On the other hand, the professor argues this assertion and states that these batteries produced a kind of shock when a person touched them. She describes that this fact can be interpreted that these devices can produce invisible power, and the owners of them could convince people that they had magical power. Moreover, people used them for healing because by producing electricity current, they could relieve pains, and also doctors used those batteries for the same purpose.
- Some people think that success is most important in their life Others think that it s more important to be happy when they fail Which idea do you agree with and why 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time 70
- hgh 3
- Do you agree or disagree Asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...teries. The professor, however, refutes all of the evidence stated by the text, mentioning...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 22.412803532 254% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 379.0 270.72406181 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10026385224 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51759840689 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525065963061 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3524218781 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.866666667 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.