Intergrated
In the lecture the professor questions the reading’s assertion that there are three reasons that affect the Little Ice Age. In the lecture, the professor disproves the reasons one by one.
Firstly, the reading mentions that unexpected Little Ice Age produce the Gulf Stream. However, the professor suggests that Gulf Stream is only contributed by the cold weather in northern semisphere. And in that time, Little Ice Age is influence all around the world.
Second, the reading cites volcanic eruptions produced lots of surfur and dust that would block the sunlight and the low temperature leads to Little Ice Age. But the professor says that volcanic eruptions would effects more. phenomenons, such as grey snow. Unfortunately, there was no such phenomenons that were reported.
Lastly, the reading says that the decrease of human population causes the Little Ice Age. The professor rebuts this by saying that human’s agriculture would was not long enough to cause the Little Ice Age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...ssor says that volcanic eruptions would effects more. phenomenons, such as grey snow. U...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Phenomenons
... volcanic eruptions would effects more. phenomenons, such as grey snow. Unfortunately, ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, lastly, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 159.0 270.72406181 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31446540881 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69977664927 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 145.348785872 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6326650376 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8181818182 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.