The argument is based on the Age of the internet. The writer on the reading passage is arguing about how internet has affected the life of human for the worst. While the lecturer in listening passage is opposing the reading passage with the following arguments:
In the reading passage, the writer says that the use of internet is making people dumber. They are more inclined to discover than invent. The opinions of people have been forged with the information available on the internet. But, the lecturer has denied the claim, saying that the internet is not making people dumber. It is making people smarter, giving them the opportunity to learn and explore more. Further, he supports his argument with a report of a survey conducted on a region accessing internet that IQ of the people has increased by 1.8 points. the study clearly shows that internet is not making people dumb. The lecturer further adds that with internet students do not need to fully rely on what is being taught in the class. People are learning and exploring different languages, cultures even when they have not visited the place.
Furthermore, the lecturer has argued the claim made by reading passage about how the internet is affecting the attention span of the people. Internet pages with hyperlinks and advertisement is reducing the concentration period of the people. The lecturer argues on this claim, saying people are now being able to concentarte more on things they are truely interested in. Internet has helped people to be more accustomed with mutlitasking.
With the argument, it is clear that the lecturer and the writer are finding it difficult to come on the common ground.
- It is better to have a mentor to advise you in your career than to rely entirely on yourself 70
- It is better to have a mentor to advise you in your career than to rely entirely on yourself 70
- A nation should require all of it s students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Internet is good or bad 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the people has increased by 1.8 points. the study clearly shows that internet is no...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99285714286 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56020367493 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489285714286 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.647574208 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.375 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6875 7.06452816374 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160846227769 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724186208523 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535170342941 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928915993254 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549443932572 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.