life on venus
The passage presents arguments about the impossibility of human life on Venus because of its inhospitable and extreme conditions. The lecturer contradicts this concept and claims that the issues raised in the passge can all be resolved if a floating station, like a balloon, could be established fifty kilometeres above the surface of Venus. His further demonstrations are as follows.
Firstly, although the pressure is too extreme on the surface of Venus, as we know from the principals of physics, with increasing distance from the surface, the pressure drops. Therefore, the pressure on the floating station would be equal to the pressure we exprience on the surface of the planet earth.
Secondly, there is no water or oxygen on the surface and in the atmosphere of Venus. However, the nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and sulfuric acid in the atmosphere can be transformed to water and oxygen through chemical reactions taking place in the floating station. Thus, the transfer of water and oxygen would not be necessary.
Finally, whereas there are still clouds fifty kilometeres above the surface of Venus, they are not as thick as they are in lower latitudes. Additionally, the clouds that are positioned below the station would reflect the sunlight. Hence, the floating station would be able to use both the direct and the reflected sunlight to generate adequate solar power for their equipments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-02 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-20 | Zahra Attaran Bondarabadi | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-05 | hind aljubori | 71 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- TPO 29 agree or not to improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 90
- TPO Extra 2 integrated smarts cars are faster safer and cheaper 80
- at universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 90
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 76
- TPO 47 integrated pterosaurs could not fly because they were so big could not take off from ground and cold blooded 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22566371681 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80191931019 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7444710163 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17570564295 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065946284894 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893426456877 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101690800687 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074911483246 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.