literature
The reading is about a decrease in the tendency to read literature. The author believes in this statement and provides three consequences of it. the lecturer challenges the statements made by the authtor. She is of the opinion that none of these is true.
First of all, the author suggests that apart from literature, none of the other genres can provide intellectual imagination. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that science, history, and politics can also improve imagination ability as well as literature.
Secondly, the writer contends that the decline in reading literature can be lowered the cultural level of society because nowadays people are more interested in watching a music video or reading a web page instead of reading a novel or poems. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that music and movies are the contemporary sources of an impression since the cultures change over time.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that, at this time, publishers invest in the literature less than past since the number of readers has decreased. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that it is writers imperfection because they use a complex language in comparison with the previous ones.
- universities should give credit to sports and social activities as well as classes and libraries 60
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Rembrandt painting 83
- movies 76
- sports and social programs as well as science 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19117647059 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8114016502 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4488191738 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094862499908 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272657181548 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588263846193 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543995039856 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549141539214 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.