Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the stars, much as early human sailors did. What we know about humpback whales makes this a distinct possibility. First, humpback whales seem to be intelligent enough to use stars to navigate by. Whales' brains have a high degree of complexity'a common determiner of intelligence. This suggests that the whales' brain power far exceeds that of most other animals. The whales' well-developed cognitive ability seems to provide a sound basis for the ability to use a complex, abstract system of sensory stimuli such as the night sky for orientation. Second, humpback whales migrate in straight lines. Animals can maintain movement in a straight direction for long distances only if they orient themselves by some external objects or forces. Many birds and other terrestrial creatures, for example, use physical landmarks to help them stay on track as they migrate. Whales, which swim in the open ocean, cannot rely on land features; they could, however, rely on stars at night to provide them with external signs by which to maintain direction over long distances. Third, humpback whales exhibit an unusual behavior: they are sometimes observed floating straight up for minutes at a time, their heads above the water as though they were looking upward. The behavior is known as spy-hopping, and it is very rare among marine animals. One explanation for the function of spy-hopping is that the whales are looking at the stars, which are providing them with information to navigate by.
In the reading passage, the author discusses three kinds of the reason the support the idea that Humpback whales use stars during their migrate, while the lecturer claims that what the reading passage states is not convincing and disputes those reasons presented in the reading passage bu several proofs.
First, both the text and the talk discusses about Humpback whales intelligent. In this regard, the belief in the reading passage is that Humpback whales are more powerful than other animals and so intelligence to use stars during the migration. However, the speaker views to this issue is from an opposite angle. According with the speaker, there is no relationship between the intelligent and the ability of using start for navigation. Also, mentions to the bird spices which migrate by using stars event though are intelligent.
Second, both the reading and listening material put forth the idea of the straight line migration of Humpback whales. In this vein, the author states that animals can navigate in straight line only when they orient themselves by some external objects or forces such as birds which use the landmark to track their ways and in the open ocean environment the best way is the using of start. On the other hand, the lecturer admit that some external object or force stimulate Humpback whales to migrate in straight line, but refutes the using stars to explan this phenomenon. The lecturer says that Humpback whales maybe able to use earth magnetic field. Because of the bio magnetized which id detected in the Humpback whales brain, this animals maybe able to use earth magnify.
Third, the writer make point to the idea that Humpback whales unusual behavior like looking to the upward and writer think by this way they use the star to continue their ways. By contrast, the lecturer take shark as an example which is do this behavior to find the author animal for eating. Beside, Humpback whales show this behavior in the day when there is no star in the sky.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...turer take shark as an example which is do this behavior to find the author animal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, third, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94362017804 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33396324082 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501483679525 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2402280735 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148142612475 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637291484933 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314115910825 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926276366962 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035190774215 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.