Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the impacts of working as a group in a company. While the reading explains the merits of working together with other people, the lecture refutes all the points mentioned in the passage using its own reasons and evidence.
To begin with, the passage claims that working in a group offers plenty of abilities and wisdom than a person working alone. the lecture, on the other hand, rebuts this opinion by stating that some workers get a free ride while teamwork. He elaborates on this by saying recognition and fame are not awarded to the person who contributed significantly but to all members of the group.
Furthermore, the author of the article mentions that prompt work can be done by a group as they have much more information. However, the lecturer argues that it actually takes a long time as a myriad of discussions and meetings are needed to work as a team.
Finally, the last point in the reading passage states that being involved in group work can be very rewarding. According to the professor, if the group work fails, the one to be blamed will be the whole group instead of the one who messed up the project.
In conclusion, the reading passage mentions three different ideas about working four days a week. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...and wisdom than a person working alone. the lecture, on the other hand, rebuts this...
^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...g four days a week. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and eviden...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76595744681 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49386390471 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540425531915 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.153709659 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107783474931 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447017818971 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307415173726 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607061594133 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278213917541 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.