Both the passage and lecture discuss about possibility of human presence on Venus. The reading passage presents several reasons which make it impossible to maintain permanent human presence on that planet. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea of making floating station rather than standing stations which can provide better opportunities to establish human presence on Venus.
To begin with, the author posits that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is too much to survive and and any spacecraft would be crushed by this extreme pressure at surface. In the contrary, the professor states that if human stations float 50 km above surface, pressure would be as much as human are used to in Earth and then there would be lesser probability of being crushed.
Secondly, the reading asserts that, there are no water sources on Venus' surface and it's atmosphere contains insignificant percentage of oxygen. In addition, the author mentions that as there is no pragmatic approach to ensure regular supply of resources like water and caffeine, it eliminates the possibility of establishing permanent station on Venus. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it is possible to apply chemical process to produce water and oxygen from compounds available on Venus' atmosphere. Thus, it would not be needed to import water and oxygen from Earth and constant supply of these resources can be maintained artificially.
Finally, the author depicts that, due to presence of thick clouds in Venus' atmosphere, it reflects most of the sunlight while allowing negligible sunlight to reach the planet's surface. Furthermore, presence of dense carbon dioxide layer make this condition more critical as it blocks more light. Consequently, it would not be possible to generate electricity using solar cells in absence of light. The professor refutes the point by saying that if floating stations are used high above the clouds, those could get sunlight directly and also from reflected by carbon dioxide layer. Thus, it would help to produce electricity using solar powers and enhance the possibility of human presence on Venus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...at Venus surface is too much to survive and and any spacecraft would be crushed by this...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. In addition, the author mentions that as there is no pragmatic approach to ens...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30088495575 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71351158411 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510324483776 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8241062291 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341868850303 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121158279376 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767056003922 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199164508924 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403043757271 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.